Wednesday, October 11, 2017

Nepal should pay $ 67 million to DPR for the Korean company

KATHMANDU- The cost of Rs. 70 million has been to be utilized for the use of a detailed study report (DPR) prepared by the Korean company for the proposed second international airport in Nijgarh.



In 2011, the government had given the DPR a detailed study of the Korean company Landmark Wildlife (LMDLL) for a detailed study. The Korean company has asked for compensation of Rs. 67 million, while delayed in the construction process, even though the responsibility of preparing DPPs at 35 million in the same time is delayed.

According to the agreement between the Korean company and the Nepal government, the Nepal government did not give the responsibility of construction of the Korean company, the government had the condition to be compensated with compensation. The government has to pay Rs. 67 million to utilize the DPR after the government does not give responsibility for the construction of the Korean company.

"The Korean company asked $ 67 million, we are discussing what can be done," said Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation Minister Jitender Dev. According to the Minister of State, Government, preparing to take the DPR, the government will be comfortable to prepare another DPR based on the report of the Korean company.

In 2011, the Korean company's company Landmark Worldwide Company (LWW) had expanded the detailed study report with an estimated 3 billion 55 billion rupees for the airport except for the city city.

Similarly, with a cost of Rs 7 billion for the airport, it was estimated that the company will be constructed at 65 billion rupees for the first round of the first phase, according to the report by the Korean company.

The government has prepared to prepare another DPR based on the same report. Therefore, the condition of immediate responsibility for construction of landmark is still being claimed by the company itself itself. In order to make the construction, the condition that Nepal Sarkar had given landmark to the landmark was kept at that time.

No comments:

Post a Comment